Cursor Bugbot vs TimetoTest
Read the diff. Run the change.

Bugbot reviews the code on your pull requests. TimetoTest runs the change and shows you what broke. You probably want both.

src/components/CheckoutForm.tsx
Viewed
142
function validateCheckout(state: CheckoutState) {
143
const canSubmit = state.ready && !state.submitting;
144
- if (!state.email) return;
timetotest-code-reviewbotnow

Reproduced in the sandbox: The Place order button stays disabled after accepting the terms. Found by running checkout against the changed code.

Steps, report and video attached to the PR.
144
+ if (!state.email || !state.acceptedTerms) return;
145
return review.summary();

Where they fit in your workflow

Bugbot reviews the code. TimetoTest tests the change.

Feature
TimetoTest
Cursor
Automated pull request review
Runs the changed behavior in a sandbox
Bugbot analyzes the code rather than running the app
Uses the app like a user (sign-in, browser flows)
On the pull request
Fixes for findings
Cursor can hand findings to its agent; TimetoTest opens a fix PR where the workflow supports it
Editor integration
Shared run record with a video of browser runs
The honest breakdown

Two kinds of review

One reads the code. The other uses it.

01

Cursor Bugbot

Bugbot is Cursor's pull request reviewer. It analyzes new pull requests for logic errors, null handling, security issues and race conditions, and focuses on actionable bugs rather than style.

It follows your team's rules and connects back to Cursor, so findings can move straight into the editor and its agent.

02

TimetoTest

TimetoTest runs on connected pull requests with automatic review enabled. It runs the changed behavior in a sandbox and posts what it found back on the PR, before anyone merges.

Findings come with the steps to reproduce, a report and, for browser flows, a video anyone on the team can watch.

03

The honest verdict

Don't choose between them. Use Bugbot to review the code close to the editor.

Use TimetoTest to test what the change does when it runs.

Straight answers

Bugbot and TimetoTest

What is the core difference between Cursor Bugbot and TimetoTest?

Bugbot reads the pull request and flags likely bugs such as logic errors, null handling and security issues. TimetoTest runs the changed behavior in a sandbox and reports what actually happened. One reviews the code; the other tests the change.

Do I need TimetoTest if my team already uses Bugbot?

They catch different problems. Bugbot can spot a bug in code that no user flow touches. TimetoTest can catch a broken flow where the code looked fine. Many teams will want both.

Does TimetoTest replace Cursor?

No. Keep writing code in Cursor. TimetoTest is the check after the change: it runs the pull request and tells you whether the flows your users depend on still work.

Already using Bugbot?
Add a test run.

Connect a repository and get a tested result on your next pull request.

Free account; testing requires credits or a paid planWorks with GitHub & GitLab