Cursor works in the editor and on the diff. TimetoTest works on the running app.
Cursor helps a developer write the change. TimetoTest checks it for the whole team.
Cursor is an AI code editor with an agent that writes and edits code across your repository, runs commands and can use a browser while you work.
Bugbot is Cursor's pull request reviewer. It reads the diff and comments on likely bugs before merge.
TimetoTest gives your team AI teammates that test the app. Give them a staging URL and say what should work in plain English. They sign in, use it just like your users do, and show you what broke. No scripts.
On every pull request, the same agent can run the changed behavior in a sandbox and post what it found, with a report and a video of browser runs.
Write the change in Cursor. Let Bugbot read the diff. Let TimetoTest run the app.
Code review and app testing catch different problems. Together they cover both the code and what your users see.
Cursor's agent can check a page while you work in the editor, which is useful for one developer in the moment. TimetoTest runs automatically on every pull request for the whole team, with a sandbox per PR, real sign-in flows and a shared record with a video of each browser run.
Bugbot reads the diff and flags likely bugs. TimetoTest runs the change and reports what a user would actually hit. Bugbot can catch a problem in the code that a user flow never touches; TimetoTest can catch a broken flow where the code looked fine. Many teams will want both.
No. Keep writing code in Cursor. TimetoTest is the check after the change: it uses the running app and tells you whether the flows your users depend on still work.
