Code review that goes beyond comments
Static analysis and runtime checks catch different kinds of bugs. TimetoTest checks the affected behavior with evidence.
Automatic review for connected PRs
After repository and webhook setup, supported pull request events trigger a review. Reviews need repository permissions and available usage.
Sandbox-verified fixes
Instead of commenting and moving on, TimetoTest compiles and runs tests in an isolated sandbox to verify the affected behavior.
Objective bug detection
Null pointer risks, security vulnerabilities, memory leaks, and logic errors — caught with evidence, not vibes.
Security & compliance controls
Project-scoped access, isolated execution and configurable review-history deletion control how code is accessed and retained.
Weekly digest
A Friday summary of issues caught and fixed gives engineering managers a high-level view of code health.
Evidence on every finding
Findings include the evidence used to verify them, such as source context, build logs or test output. Runtime results describe the checks actually executed.
From PR open to fix in four steps
Silent automation your team barely notices — when it brings back findings your team can inspect.
Connect your repository
Connect a supported repository, confirm its permissions, and configure the review workflow.
PR opens, review starts
The agent scans the diff, checks the changed code against your test suite, and identifies objective issues.
Evidence is attached
Findings include build logs, test output, and the code path that caused the issue — so reviewers can verify quickly.
Fix PR where enabled
TimetoTest opens a fix branch with the correction applied, checked, and ready for human review.
AI code review, explained
What is AI code review?
AI code review is automated analysis of pull request changes. Tools like TimetoTest scan the diff for bugs, security issues, and logic errors, attach evidence, and can open a Fix PR with the correction applied.
How does TimetoTest code review work?
When a pull request is opened, TimetoTest scans the diff, spins up the changes in an isolated sandbox, compiles, runs tests to verify issues, and opens a Fix PR where enabled. Automatic reviews require a connected repository, configured triggers, permissions and available usage.
Is AI code review safe to use?
TimetoTest runs PRs in a sandbox with project-level history controls and separate artifact retention, and it attaches evidence to every finding so reviewers can verify the fix before merging.
Does AI code review replace human review?
No. It removes the grunt work — scanning for objective bugs, security flaws, and logic errors — so humans can focus on design, trade-offs, and product decisions.